WORKPLACE: Derailing the career train

Are the qualities required to successfully start a good career the same as those required to move an employee up the management ladder? Many organisations can relate to this: a bright and promising employee, with excellent credentials, who after several years of making admirable progress up the career ladder, begins to nose-dive and deteriorate in terms of managerial ability, gradually getting to a point where he is either labeled a poor manager or leader, or where he simply falls out of the system as a result of an inability to operate within it.

Derailment is a term used to refer to the usually sudden deviation of a senior employee from his or her career path or job. Derailment scenarios are varied and may arise from any of the following: disillusionment or disenchantment with a job or career after several years, gross incompetence, inability to perform job functions effectively or outright misdemeanor.

What is required to get an employee a job? In order to secure an excellent job, the emphasis of employers and employees is on simple, objective measures of success and achievement – basic and higher educational degrees, the prestige of institutions attended, membership of professional associations, work experience and other indices of merit.

What ensures an employee stays on the train and gets promoted? Interestingly though, the factors that are required to keep an employee, once employed, in a constant upward flux up the career ladder are more behaviour-based and intangible than those that got him there in the first place. While possessing a good degree in the right discipline, attending reputable organisations, having the right professional qualifications or affiliations, being the right age or gender and having the right work experience might be fundamental to an employee’s success and ability to procure an excellent job position, it is his ability to communicate successfully, prioritise well, maintain good interpersonal relationships, manage subordinates, relate successfully, be viewed favorably by superiors and work well within a team that keep him moving along in the train. The employee finds that his inability to meet these subtle / ‘soft’ aspects of job demands renders him unable to make anticipated progress in his career. He may then continue in his career, achieving more senior levels of employment, but if he does not soon realise that he must exchange the skills for which he was employed with new managerial/organisational skills required to keep him moving, he may get knocked off that career train, or as the term goes, derailed.

Several studies conducted on the subject of derailment generally discover that, once in management positions within organisations, senior staff spend increasing amounts of time engaging in highly subjective activities such as ‘paying homage’ to even more senior colleagues and riding the waves of organisational politics. Managers and executives who do not possess such ‘skills’ and are not able to handle such activities effectively may find themselves frustrated out of the career train entirely.

Studies on the reasons why executives derail in the career ladder, when a lot more might have been expected of them indicate that derailment occurs for a number of reasons including managers having strengths that are so strong they eventually manifest as liabilities; intolerance to other employees; poor communication skills; inability to think strategically; unnecessary aggression towards others; poor conflict resolution; inability to adapt or manage changing situations and; an overly narrow outlook or orientation. These problems are obviously distinct from the initial skills and attributes required at the onset of a career and appear unlikely to have been focused on either during the employment process or during early career development stages.

What can managers do? In order to remain relevant, prevent derailment and maintain upward movement on the career train, managers can attempt to: seek feedback on their management skills throughout their careers; seek developmental opportunities that help overcome flaws and add new skills; continually seek coaching and mentoring; and consistently take responsibility for personal development.

What can organisations do? The underachievement or derailment of employees, on whom precious resources have been spent in training and development, is a genuine source of concern for organisations. Signs of imminent derailment usually do not manifest overnight but may be detected in an employee’s pattern of behaviour and manner of handling management situations. Organisations that promote the fostering of skills which can help a manager or executive perform effectively when he eventually rises to senior management positions are likely to reduce the incidence of eventual executive derailment.

However, the aggressive result-orientedness of many organisations and the continual rewarding of ‘performance’ may mask unhealthy management practices which, if left unchecked, will resurface when employees move along the train and take up more senior positions.

http://www.resolutionmediation.net/

Resolution Mediation

Boonstraonehour

Air Quality’s One Hour

Auto Transport Montreal  and Car Carrier GTA Ontario

WORKPLACE: Derailing the career train

Are the qualities required to successfully start a good career the same as those required to move an employee up the management ladder? Many organisations can relate to this: a bright and promising employee, with excellent credentials, who after several years of making admirable progress up the career ladder, begins to nose-dive and deteriorate in terms of managerial ability, gradually getting to a point where he is either labeled a poor manager or leader, or where he simply falls out of the system as a result of an inability to operate within it.

Derailment is a term used to refer to the usually sudden deviation of a senior employee from his or her career path or job. Derailment scenarios are varied and may arise from any of the following: disillusionment or disenchantment with a job or career after several years, gross incompetence, inability to perform job functions effectively or outright misdemeanor.

What is required to get an employee a job? In order to secure an excellent job, the emphasis of employers and employees is on simple, objective measures of success and achievement – basic and higher educational degrees, the prestige of institutions attended, membership of professional associations, work experience and other indices of merit.

What ensures an employee stays on the train and gets promoted? Interestingly though, the factors that are required to keep an employee, once employed, in a constant upward flux up the career ladder are more behaviour-based and intangible than those that got him there in the first place. While possessing a good degree in the right discipline, attending reputable organisations, having the right professional qualifications or affiliations, being the right age or gender and having the right work experience might be fundamental to an employee’s success and ability to procure an excellent job position, it is his ability to communicate successfully, prioritise well, maintain good interpersonal relationships, manage subordinates, relate successfully, be viewed favorably by superiors and work well within a team that keep him moving along in the train. The employee finds that his inability to meet these subtle / ‘soft’ aspects of job demands renders him unable to make anticipated progress in his career. He may then continue in his career, achieving more senior levels of employment, but if he does not soon realise that he must exchange the skills for which he was employed with new managerial/organisational skills required to keep him moving, he may get knocked off that career train, or as the term goes, derailed.

Several studies conducted on the subject of derailment generally discover that, once in management positions within organisations, senior staff spend increasing amounts of time engaging in highly subjective activities such as ‘paying homage’ to even more senior colleagues and riding the waves of organisational politics. Managers and executives who do not possess such ‘skills’ and are not able to handle such activities effectively may find themselves frustrated out of the career train entirely.

Studies on the reasons why executives derail in the career ladder, when a lot more might have been expected of them indicate that derailment occurs for a number of reasons including managers having strengths that are so strong they eventually manifest as liabilities; intolerance to other employees; poor communication skills; inability to think strategically; unnecessary aggression towards others; poor conflict resolution; inability to adapt or manage changing situations and; an overly narrow outlook or orientation. These problems are obviously distinct from the initial skills and attributes required at the onset of a career and appear unlikely to have been focused on either during the employment process or during early career development stages.

What can managers do? In order to remain relevant, prevent derailment and maintain upward movement on the career train, managers can attempt to: seek feedback on their management skills throughout their careers; seek developmental opportunities that help overcome flaws and add new skills; continually seek coaching and mentoring; and consistently take responsibility for personal development.

What can organisations do? The underachievement or derailment of employees, on whom precious resources have been spent in training and development, is a genuine source of concern for organisations. Signs of imminent derailment usually do not manifest overnight but may be detected in an employee’s pattern of behaviour and manner of handling management situations. Organisations that promote the fostering of skills which can help a manager or executive perform effectively when he eventually rises to senior management positions are likely to reduce the incidence of eventual executive derailment.

However, the aggressive result-orientedness of many organisations and the continual rewarding of ‘performance’ may mask unhealthy management practices which, if left unchecked, will resurface when employees move along the train and take up more senior positions.

Wpg Auto Financing

Resolution Mediation

http://www.resolutionmediation.net

Steps to Resolve Workplace Conflicts

Are members of your staff like oil and water – not mixing well enough to become a team? As a manager, you’ve seen the stress involved, and are not immune to their feelings as well as the pressure from your own boss about budgets, time constraints and deadlines. Tempers can flare at a moment’s notice and conflict can have serious consequences.
At the foundation of stress is communication; more often than not, it is due to the lack of communication. When we encounter a situation that we believe we are not in control of, our “fight or flight” reaction kicks in. In most situations, the “flight” is not an option. We react instead of respond.

So, how do you deal with these potentially explosive challenges? Let’s look at four scenarios:

SCENARIO ONE
The conflict: Sally, a purchasing manager, is a fast-talker and skims over details. She has just resolved a crisis that took several hours (and is exhausted from the effort). Tom, one of her suppliers, is a slower-paced talker who calls her to confirm the particulars on a proposal. Sally feels pressured to make up for her lost morning. Tom, wanting to thoroughly understand what he will be bidding on, thinks there is ambiguity. Based on their previous interactions, Sally knows she needs to slow down how fast she talks to lessen their frustration.

Tom feels she is patronizing him, even when Sally speaks slowly. He becomes defensive and stubborn, and his voice tone reflects that. She hears his defensiveness and that fuels her defensiveness.

The resolution: Sally should ask Tom if they can postpone the conversation. That should give Tom knowledge that her impatience will be more prevalent if they talk now.

If Tom needs to get his questions answered immediately, they need to be aware of each other’s schedules, stress levels and reactions.

Tom needs to disregard Sally’s tone of voice and focus on the words she says. He also needs to focus on the most important questions, even if it means he won’t ask every single question. Sally needs to realize Tom’s attention to details is part of his personality, and his frustration will increase if he doesn’t get his questions answered.

SCENARIO TWO
The conflict: Manager Linda has been putting off this performance discussion with Jack, her direct report, because she thinks Jack is too agreeable – he seems to waffle on decisions and won’t justify his actions. She knows this meeting will take too much time and not enough will be accomplished.

Jack, too, is dreading this meeting. Linda is impatient and interrupts or cuts him off before he can fully explain himself. Then he gets flustered and feels uncomfortable. He wishes she would tell him what she wants done and how she wants it done.

The more frustrated Linda gets, the faster and louder she talks. The more stressed Jack gets, the quieter he gets. Linda perceives Jack as being weak, which causes her to become more argumentative. Jack translates this into her being intimidating, and he reacts by withdrawing more.

The resolution: Linda and Jack are at opposite ends of the behavioral scale. Linda’s aggressiveness is heightened by Jack’s submissiveness. Neither one realizes the effect they are having on each other.

Linda needs to become more aware of her voice tone – whether it sounds harsh, loud, sarcastic, angry, condescending or frustrated. She also can look at Jack’s body language; it is telling her that he is uncomfortable

Jack needs to understand what his body language is saying. As difficult as it may be, he needs to sit up, look Linda in the eye, and calmly explain his actions.

He is looking for Linda to like him and be his friend when what he can look for is Linda’s respect.

SCENARIO THREE
The conflict: One particular meeting’s agenda items were crucial to the success of the current project. Several key decisions have to be made and implemented quickly. True to form, Jane is laughing and telling stories with little regard for the time crunch. John’s irritation is growing and he can’t understand why no one, especially the boss, is taking control of the situation.

The resolution: Jane and John deal with stress in their own way, yet they don’t realize it. Each expects the other person to act the same way, instead they are both reacting. Jane’s stories need to be toned down without alienating her, and John needs to stop taking the meeting so critically.

When the meeting leader realizes Jane is telling another animated story, he can say, “Jane, that sounds great and we’d love to hear about it! We need to keep this meeting running on time … how about if you tell us about it later?” Saying this with a smile and in a light tone of voice will keep her defenses down, yet give her the recognition that she needs.

When John begins to dig down to the minutia he feels comfortable with, he needs to realize that’s his way of dealing with stress. John needs to be given time, outside the formal meeting, to research alternatives and adjust to the decisions made.

SCENARIO FOUR
The conflict: Alice is “all business” at the office, and expects others to be the same. The team has stopped asking her to join them for lunch because her response is always “no.” They consider her standoffish and aloof because she does not share personal information. Alice keeps conversations focused on deadlines and projects, and is quick to return to her desk immediately afterwards. If her knowledge was not such an integral component of the team’s performance, no one would interact with her.

The resolution: Alice prefers facts, figures and tasks over interacting with people. She does not consider herself rude or distant – in fact, she shares her knowledge with all her team members. Alice is not purposely aloof; she prefers to get close to the team by working closely in the office environment. If the team approaches her as a group, she may feel intimidated. One team member should ask Alice to stay after a meeting and emphasize from a business standpoint the bottom line results of reaching out in a personal way to others. Stress the value to her when others can appreciate her talents in a personal way.

It’s also important to talk to the team members and let them know that Alice is not snubbing them; she just prefers distance. Realizing that Alice will never be as chummy as they are with each other can mitigate some of the conflict.

Cause and effect
Each of these situations can be resolved if those involved become aware of what their hot buttons are, and the effect their reaction has on the other person. A leader can easily step in and work with each employee to see the other person’s strengths and weaknesses, and how they affect their point of view.

Knowing our behaviors are in direct response to our perceptions allows us to view the situation more objectively. It takes a conscious awareness and a lot of deep breaths to respond, and not react. The rewards make it worth the effort.

http://www.reliableplant.com/article.asp?articleid=16396